How We Know What We Know by Michelle Kunz

Most of what we know is someone’s opinion. In fact, most of what we know is someone else’s opinion. I’m reading a fascinating biography on Mary Queen of Scots and although the author is a well known English historian and has researched her subject thoroughly, most of what she writes is her interpretation of what few unarguable facts remain of her subject’s life. It turns out most of modern life works the same way. Unless we are subject matter experts in a pure science such as mathematics or biology, most of what we know is our own or someone else’s opinion. We give lip service to innovation, but we have no idea how to begin with something as simple as innovating how we know what we know.

This applies most basically and most powerfully to the questions of who we are and why we do what we do. Most of us define who we are in terms of our current and past roles. “I am business owner or executive, life partner, parent, child, friend.” These are indeed facts, but what they actually say about us are opinions. What does it say about us that we are an executive at Company X? That we are in a relationship with Person Y? That we are the child of These Parents? We aren’t always sure what it says, and often the meaning doesn’t carry any true connection to who we are inside. That’s because what it says is someone else’s words imbued with someone else’s meaning.

Defining “Who am I?” can be one of the most liberating and empowering exercises we ever engage with. Claiming our attributes and characteristics, our preferences and strengths, reframing what we once saw as negative into positive — all of these activities clarify areas of our lives and our work where once there was vague cloudiness. We gain focus and motivation, definition, power, and new frames from which to lead and empower others.

Who are you really? If you stop listening to the opinions of others, and even your own old mantras about roles and positions, who are you? What are the implications for fully claiming that identity? What one action can you take this week to wean yourself off the opinions of others and begin to claim the leader you really are?

The Triangle by Michelle Kunz

The triangle can work to support the goals of each of the three angles and be in balance. Or it can pit the goals of each against the goals of the others and fall. Here’s how it works:

In this example, you are holding up the expectations of your team and the organization without support. You carry the weight of success or failure, and it is easy to see how any little mistake or slip one way or the other will cause the structure to fall. This is what it looks like to live in a world where you strive to control things which are not within your control.

The success or failure of the team and organization are not wholly within your control and yet you bear the weight of the outcome. Although you may be giving to each of the other angles, and they are giving as well, this structure is not balanced. Furthermore, personal growth is practically impossible because of all the weight you carry. You have no time or energy to spend on yourself or your development because you are too busy balancing the team and organizational expectations and demands.

 

Here we see what it looks like to live in a world where we recognize that we cannot control outside variables. Instead, we choose environments which support our internal values and goals. While this sounds selfish at the outset, what happens as a result is equilibrium. Since the team and the greater organization align with our vision, mission, values, dreams and goals, they support us while we in turn give our best back to each of the other angles. This is a solid, stable structure which can grow and support us in exploring how high and how far we want to go.How balanced is your triangle and how might making a conscious shift better support you and your entire team to more powerful equilibrium?, , , , , ,

The Range of Engagement Model by Michelle Kunz

Bruce Schneider’s Range of Engagement Model illustrates the relationship between choice and the level of someone’s engaged energy for a particular task or relationship. As we progress from a disempowering perspective of “I won’t” through “I have to” and “I need to” to “I choose to,” we begin to experience a shift in energy, from destructive, or catabolic, to constructive, or anabolic.

That shift happens as we move into the realm of choice. Even a perspective of need pulls us back into catabolic energy because we experience the situation as lacking something — it needs something from us. This may or may not be true, but as long as we engage in the action of judging it to be true, we engage with catabolic energy. (Recall that judging is not the same as discerning.)

When we shift to choice we shift to a perspective based on opportunity. I choose because I see the advantages for myself, for others, for my team, my organization, my relationship, the world. I choose because I want something to happen — something great. This perspective is future oriented, action oriented, possibility oriented. There are no judgments implied, simply possibilities extended.

From which position are your actions motivated? How can you shift to the most empowering perspective and put the power of choice and engagement to work for you in your leadership and team interactions?